Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 021
Original file (2013 021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-021

 

Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1900.4D, ART. 1.B.17, JKA,
Pattern of Misconduct, RE4

Honorable
None

Separation Authority should be amended to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art 1.B.17

 

 

TIS 4 yrs, 4 months, 23 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Pattern of Misconduct due to alcohol related incidents, an inappropriate
relationship and assaulting another shipmate.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was notified of the intent to

discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney. A statement was made while objecting to
the discharge.

The member was discharged with the SPD code of JKA due to the variety of misconduct during the period of
service. The applicant states that the command recommended an Honorable Discharge, although all the
separation documents read with a recommendation for a General Discharge. The applicant received a General,
Under Honorable Conditions Discharge with an RE4 reentry code.

The Board does note that the DD-214 incorrectly cites the Separation Authority. The SPD code of JKA is
aligned with the Military Separations Manual, COMDTINST M1000.4, Art 1.B.17 vice the Certificate of
Release of Discharge Form Active Duty, DD Form 214 Manual.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief. An administrative change

to the Separation Authority in Block 25 of the applicant’s DD-214 to be amended to: COMDTINST M1000.4,
Art 1.B.17.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 006

    Original file (2013 006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record, Summary Courts-Martial, Pretrial Agreement, and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The applicant (and attorney brief) states that the victims were reciprocal in the physical contact, text messages, and sexual nature initiated by the applicant. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity on the merits of this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 053

    Original file (2013 053.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant voluntarily requested a separation for ‘The Good of the Service’ vice in lieu of the Court Martial proceedings and punishment. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The DD-214 was issued incorrectly with Article 1.A.1.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 060

    Original file (2013 060.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had a positive urinalysis result during a random testing in late 2012. The applicant’s had 10 years of service which afforded the right to an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) that occurred in the Spring of 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 078

    Original file (2013 078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-078 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 a BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. Thereafter, the SPO issued an Under Honorable Conditions character of Service. Based on the final approval made by EPM, the...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 038

    Original file (2014 038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With regard to the Narrative Reason for Separation, the applicant had previously been to outpatient treatment in 2009 for a self-referral. On the equity standard, the board referred to ALCOAST 125/10 to make a recommendation on the Narrative Reason (NR) for his separation. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief is granted based on post-policy issued in ALCOAST 125/10: Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, ART 1.B.15 SPD code: JND Narrative Reason...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 064

    Original file (2013 064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is asking that the board look at the entirety of service time with regard to the Character of Service that was issued. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Propriety: Discharge was proper.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 031

    Original file (2013 031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per procedure, the sample was sent to FT. Meade to test the validity of the sample. The Coast Guard has zero tolerance for drug abuse. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055

    Original file (2013 055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 056

    Original file (2013 056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-056 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, ART 12.B.18, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 BY DRB to JHJ, RE code to RE-3Y, Narrative Reason to Unsatisfactory Performance CORRECTIONS TIS 1 yr, 6 months, 16 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to receiving two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. In 2010, the command initiated Discharge proceedings which made...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 046

    Original file (2014 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.